Southern California Criminal Lawyer Blog

Civil Rights and The Justice Firm’s Team that Fights to Uphold Them and Defend Them

March 3, 2023 | by The Justice Firm

The term “civil rights” encompasses a very broad variety of rights. Some of those rights are enshrined in the Constitution, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, the right to due process, and the right to equal protection under the law. In addition to the Constitution, many civil rights have been and continue to be addressed and protected in greater detail by federal and state laws. Some of the most prominent examples include:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, and sex;
The Americans with Disabilities Act; and

Continue Reading →

Sexual Violence and Abuse in California Prisons

February 7, 2023 | by The Justice Firm

We live in a civilized society and being imprisoned does not mean giving up basic human rights. While, as a result of incarceration, inmates do have some of their rights limited and prisons are allowed to curtail certain rights based on safety and security, there are certain basic fundamental human rights that cannot be taken away from an individual, even when they have been incarcerated in prison or county jail.

The Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution protects inmates from cruel and unusual punishment. As a result, inmates are entitled to be housed in humane conditions. Furthermore, inmates are entitled to adequate mental and medical care, which for women include the right to prenatal and other necessary medical care, if they are pregnant, as well as postpartum care. Furthermore, female inmates have the right to refuse sterilization or any other birth control if they do not want it. Moreover, incarcerated individuals are entitled to freedom from discrimination, sexual harassment, the use of excessive force and assault, which includes sexual assault.

In 2003 the Prison Rape Elimination Act established a zero-tolerance policy for rape in any United States prison, which includes state as well as federal prisons. Unfortunately, sexual assault and rape in prisons across the United States continues to be a prevalent problem and countless inmates suffer as a result.

Continue Reading →

The Los Angeles District Attorney’s New Immigration Policy

December 15, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

A criminal conviction can have a life changing and potentially devastating impact on anyone. However, under federal law, certain offenses are considered deportable, including controlled substance offenses, crimes of moral turpitude, and aggravated felonies. So, for noncitizens, a criminal conviction brings with it potentially very grave collateral immigration consequences. In many instances, the individuals who are convicted of qualifying offenses, have spent their entire adulthood in the United States, have build their lives and have families here, and have no other place they would call home. Yet, following a criminal conviction, noncitizens face the threat of ending up in immigration court to face a potential removal and deportation to a strange country and permanent separation from their families.

Fortunately, in light of the adverse immigration consequences noncitizens face, some district attorneys are starting to adjust their offices’ immigration-related policies, including the Los Angeles District Attorney, George Gascon. On December 6, 2022, Mr. Gascon issued a new special directive outlining the new immigration policies of the LA District Attorney’s Office, which, among other things, is aiming to address the overly punitive consequences accused noncitizens could face.

First, according to the new policy, prior to when a charging decision is made, any person who is under investigation or their attorney, can present information demonstrating the potential adverse immigration consequences that could follow. In such cases, all charging determinations by the DA office should be made with the goal of avoiding or mitigating any adverse consequences a charge could have, and if there are possible alternatives to charges being filed, the DA office should pursue those alternatives. In addition, the new policy encourages prosecutors to expand the use of pretrial diversion programs that do not require an admission of guilt.

Continue Reading →

What Is Child Sexual Assault And Who Can Be Held Responsible

December 8, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

Various factors have contributed to childhood sexual abuse being one of the most underreported crimes, including the fact that over ninety percent of all childhood sexual assaults are perpetrated by a person personally known to the child or their family. And while the underreporting prevents us from knowing exactly how prevalent these heinous crimes are, most studies show that almost 10 percent of all children have been the victims of sexual assault.

Following some very high profile child sexual abuse scandals, including the Penn State scandal, as well as the USA Gymnastics and the Boy Scouts of America sex abuse scandals, many states, including California, took a second look at their laws and made significant changes. In California, the state legislature passed the California Child Victims Act, which came into effect on January 1, 2020. The new law makes it easier for survivors of childhood sexual abuse to hold perpetrators and organizations responsible for the abuse by extending the time victims have to file a claim. Moreover, the new law expands the definition from “childhood sexual abuse” to “childhood sexual assault,” which has broadened the scope of behaviors that could be actionable.

By law, children cannot consent to any type of sexual activity and any sexual interaction with a minor can be considered sexual assault. As a result, childhood sexual assault can take many forms and can be both physical, where there is a direct sexual contact with a child, as well as non-physical, where the perpetrator does not actually touch the victim.

Continue Reading →

Overview of the California Child Victims Act

November 19, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

Childhood sexual abuse is one of most horrific crimes imaginable. Given that it is one of the most underreported crimes, it is very hard to determine the exact number of victims, but what is undisputable is that millions of individuals have suffered instances of sexual abuse as minors. In fact, according to some studies, about 1 in 4 girls, and 1 in 13 boys in the United States experience childhood sexual abuse.

Childhood sexual assault can have a devastating and long lasting effect on a survivor of such abuse. Various studies have shown that survivors are more likely to develop depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance abuse issues, risky sexual behavior, and to struggle with various mental health issues, as well as inability to establish and maintain interpersonal relationships. Victims of childhood sexual assault are also at a higher risk for suicide and suicide attempts. Many survivors experience feelings of shame, guilt, self-blame, and have a hard time coming forward and reporting being sexually assaulted as minors. Furthermore, very often survivors suppress the memories of the assault and don’t recall it for many years after the fact.

Until January 2020, the law in California required individuals who had been sexually abused as children to come forward within eight years of turning eighteen years of age, or within three years of the time the victim discovered or should have discovered that their subsequent psychological injury or illness as an adult, was the result of sexual abuse as a child. The prior California law was severely criticized for being too restrictive and for failing to take into account the many factors affecting survivors’ ability to come forward for years after the abuse had taken place, including the stigma attached, embarrassment, or shame. The law also ignored those victims that need years of professional help to even recall the abuse.

Continue Reading →

Gubernatorial Pardon Explained

November 7, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

What is a pardon – Eligibility and Benefits

The effects of a criminal conviction do not end once an individual has served their sentence. In fact, the consequences of a criminal conviction can last forever and can impede the rest of a person’s life. Fortunately, the California Constitution gives the governor the power to grant clemency in the form of a sentence commutation or a pardon. While a commutation is directed at people who are still serving a sentence, a pardon is designed to reward people who have shown that they have been fully rehabilitated after serving their sentence for a criminal conviction.

In general, anyone who had been convicted and has completed his or her probation or parole for a California state criminal offense can apply for a Governor’s pardon. The only exceptions are for individuals who have been impeached, as well as those convicted for crimes in other jurisdictions or for federal crimes.

Continue Reading →

Commutation in California – Explained

October 21, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

What’s Commutation – Eligibility and Benefits

For the past few decades, California has been known for its tough-on-crime policies and its extremely harsh sentences. Fortunately, the California Constitution gives an individual the right to seek a commutation of sentence. Commutation is a form of clemency that the governor has the authority to grant and is an important form of post-conviction relief. In short, commutation is a reduction or a termination of a sentence.

Almost anyone who has been convicted of a state criminal offense can apply to have their sentence commuted, with the only exception being for individuals that have been impeached. Notably, commutation applies only to state crimes, and the governor lacks the power to commute sentences for convictions in another state or country, or for federal or military offenses.

Continue Reading →

Overview Of California’s Three Strikes Law And How You Can Fight It

October 5, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

History of California’s Three Strikes Law

In 1994, Californians voted overwhelmingly for Proposition 184 and enacted the “Three Strikes and You’re Out” law, which was later codified by Penal Code §667. The goal of the new law was to increase public safety and to reduce the crime rate by giving repeat offenders harsher sentences. In its original version the law required that the sentence for any felony committed by a defendant with one prior serious or violent felony conviction be doubled, and imposed a sentence of 25 years to life to any person for any felony, if the person had two prior convictions for serious or violent felonies.

In the years since its inception, the Three Strikes law has had a devastating effect on thousands of defendants. The law has led to mass incarceration and has disproportionately affected people of color, as well as the mentally ill and physically disabled defendants. Moreover, while the financial cost to the taxpayers has been exorbitant, research has shown that the extreme sentences have had little to no effect on the reduction of crime rates.

Continue Reading →

ROMERO MOTION EXPLAINED

September 28, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

In 1994, through Proposition 184, California enacted the unduly harsh Three Strikes law, which was later codified by Penal Code 667. Under the Three Strikes law, a so-called repeat offender with one or more prior violent and/or serious felonies, would receive a harsher prison sentence for a subsequent qualifying felony conviction, with a defendant with two or more such prior convictions, receiving a mandatory sentence of 25 years to life. While the Three Strikes law has been widely criticized for leading to mass incarceration and for disproportionately affecting minorities and people of color, as well as for not having a significant impact on public safety, the law is still in effect and continues to have a severe impact on the lives of thousands of defendants.

Fortunately, in 1996, in the landmark case of People v. Superior Court (Romero), the California Supreme Court gave defendants a glimpse of hope when it held that a trial court, pursuant to section 1385(a) of the California Penal Code, may, on its own, and “in furtherance of justice” strike or vacate an allegation that a defendant has been previously convicted of a serious and/or violent felony.

In that case, the defendant, Jesus Romero, was charged with possession of 0.13 grams of cocaine. The offense by itself would have resulted in up to 3 years in prison. However, the prosecutor in the case also alleged that Romero had two prior “strike” convictions for residential burglary and for an attempted residential burglary, and under the new Three Strikes law, he was facing 25 years-to-life prison sentence for simple possession of narcotics.

Continue Reading →

Explaining SB 81 And How It Can Benefit You

September 6, 2022 | by The Justice Firm

In the last few years, California’s leaders have finally put the effort to improve the State’s criminal justice system and to course-correct its policies. One of the main principles of the criminal justice system is that the punishment has to fit the crime. However, during the 1990s, the California legislature actively pursued tough on crime policies and during that time enacted more than a hundred different sentence enhancements, which have added years to the prison terms of majority of inmates. The tough on crime policies and the aggressive laws enacted as a result, have not only distorted one of the most basic legal standards of the criminal justice system, but they have also had a devastating effect on thousands of inmates, on the state budget, and have disproportionately affected marginalized and minority communities.

In 2020, Governor Newsom commissioned the Committee on Revision of the Penal Code to thoroughly examine the California Penal Code and to issue recommendations for reform. When it came to sentence enhancements, overwhelming evidence was presented that their application has failed to improve public safety and has resulted in unnecessarily long incarcerations and inequity. Studies have shown that these enhancements, which are not elements of the crime and could result in double the time a person spends in prison, have been applied disproportionately to people of color and those suffering of mental illness. During testimony before the Committee, the former Governor Brown argued that California should abolish all enhancements or, at minimum, give judges better guidance on how and when they should be applied to avoid arbitrary use.

Prior to SB 81, while judges had the authority to dismiss sentence enhancements, they almost never did so, as the law provided them with no clear guidance. Even the California Supreme Court had noted that the standards used by judges are vague. As a result, based on the Committee’s findings and recommendations on the issue, SB 81 was passed and Governor Newsom signed it into law on October 8, 2021. SB 81 became effective on January 1, 2022. Senator Skinner, who introduced the bill, has said that “SB 81 sends a clear message to our courts: Let’s use sentence enhancements judiciously and only when necessary to protect the public.”

Continue Reading →